silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · 15 days agoEnergy Dept. Attacks Climate Science in Contentious Report; The agency asked five climate skeptics to write a report criticizing the consensus on global warming. Scientists are pointing out its errorswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down10
arrow-up156arrow-down1external-linkEnergy Dept. Attacks Climate Science in Contentious Report; The agency asked five climate skeptics to write a report criticizing the consensus on global warming. Scientists are pointing out its errorswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · 15 days agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squarephutatorius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up9·15 days agoNot “skeptics”-- paid anti-science propagandists. There’s a difference between skepticism and refusing to accept overwhelming evidence. It’s like with evolution: creationists are not “evolution skeptics.” They are anti-science religious zealots and/or whackjobs.
Not “skeptics”-- paid anti-science propagandists. There’s a difference between skepticism and refusing to accept overwhelming evidence.
It’s like with evolution: creationists are not “evolution skeptics.” They are anti-science religious zealots and/or whackjobs.