Statement: https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html

Mastercard has not evaluated any game or required restrictions of any activity on game creator sites and platforms, contrary to media reports and allegations.

Our payment network follows standards based on the rule of law. Put simply, we allow all lawful purchases on our network. At the same time, we require merchants to have appropriate controls to ensure Mastercard cards cannot be used for unlawful purchases, including illegal adult content.

Media contact

Seth Eisen

seth.eisen@mastercard.com

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It feels to me like payment processing has a similar function to physical currency. Like all of those security features on the bills are used to ensure the transaction is trusted.

    Point being, I’ve long thought that payment processors are essentially doing a job that should be done by the government.

    There are strange gaps where physical services have digital analogues but are completely ignored by the government.

    I don’t understand why the treasury doesn’t process payments or why the post office doesn’t issue email addresses, for another example.

    Anyways, back to the point, physical currency specifically says that it is valid for all debts. If they applied the same logic to payment processing, then this would never happen.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Probably because government and the people in charge of government are largely tech illiterate and being literate or seeking policy advice from literate people isn’t expected.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Postal banking is a thing in some places.

      I’m not sure I want the government running those services. Like a basic one, sure, but for handling credit cards and general banking services? Nah, I don’t want the Trump administration having direct access to my purchases.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The main reason is that the credit industry isn’t in the business of running an intelligence service or part of law enforcement. That said, what they are connected to is almost the same as an intelligence service, that being the advertising industry, and there’s literally nothing stopping them from selling or even being forced to give their data to law enforcement. The only reason it doesn’t happen more I’d say is just the optics of it.

          Ultimately what’s needed is a digital payment system that’s at least somewhat anonymous, but that’s an incredibly hard nut to crack. Bitcoin tried it, but largely failed to do so (and immediately got corrupted by speculators that wanted to use it as a forex instead of currency). A couple of the other crypto currencies that have come out since then have claimed to be better but I’m still incredibly skeptical that there’s any real anonymity there.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Someone above linked GNU Taler which seems to go in the right direction, but I’m not sure how mature it is yet. It specifically claims to not be a new currency, so hopefully the speculation part won’t be an issue.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It is fucking wild that we don’t have INTERAC credit cards here in Canada