• FishFace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    If they don’t have valid proofs than they shouldn’t bomb or support bombing nuclear sites

    So just to be clear, you don’t have the relevant article of the convention to hand? I’m not an expert, but I did read a copy of it and couldn’t find anything that refers to military strikes. I think you’ve just heard this somewhere and are repeating it, but it’s not true - and, when challenged on it, you don’t acknowledge it.

    International law is clear Israel has the obligation to end occupation unconditionally

    Israel’s interference with Gaza and its continued occupation of parts of Palestine is not of the same magnitude as Russia’s invasion and annexation of Ukraine due to history going back decades.

    If it’s not smoke screens Israel would behave more not accelerate genocide.

    This assumes that European countries actually have the leverage to make Netanyahu change course. They don’t.

    And you call me naive.