

he made the agent promise not to touch production data and was surprised when it did. it effectively ran a git push
on the empty local testing database with upstream being production
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
he made the agent promise not to touch production data and was surprised when it did. it effectively ran a git push
on the empty local testing database with upstream being production
he was smart enough to just roll back to a backup
edit: downvoting me doesn’t change what happened. read the article people or atl ctrl+f for “rollback”
Replit‽ What happened to the famous website that aimed to be the Google Docs for JS with these nifty things called Repl’s?
new copper golems be looking plastic
deleted by creator
not when it’s been reposted atl once every week
People before ChatGPT thought critically of things on Google as much as they do ChatGPT today.
That’s easy, just say there were features they wanted
installing it successfully is an accomplishment
Not really with archiinstall, but indeed as you say reading the manual is an expectation. Their philosophy is “creating an environment that is straightforward and relatively easy for the user to understand directly, rather than providing polished point-and-click style management tools”, as well-summarized by Wikipedia.
wants to shape their OS and user experience as they think is best
tbh that goes for every distro. It’s just that Canonical is more hands-on with its approach. The major complaint with Snap besides performance issues is Canonical making it so that only the Snap versions of popular apps (most famously, the bundled Firefox) are available by default.
okay that’s enough. here’s the actual answer:
People have told me I don’t know how good I have it.
That my complaints about Linux['s accessibility for the blind] are too much. That I’m spoiled. That back in the day, things were harder. That Windows XP was worse in every way. That modern systems are faster, more usable, more accessible — and I’m just being dramatic.
So I decided to call that bluff.
—part 1
One of the points Fireborn made in their famous “I Want to Love Linux. It Doesn’t Love Me Back” series is that Linux accessibility has deteriorated a lot over time.
Yes according to both the article and the \mathbb X thread. https://x.com/jasonlk/status/1946240562736365809 I pointed this out below and got downvoted to -8 for it smh.