Maybe now they have a chance to demonstrate that these filters don’t work.

Plus: shady managing of the network connections that could lead to mass surveillance, poor E2E encryption, and now a partnership with Musk.

That’s an interesting point. I always wondered how the transition to green energy would have affected the Middle East, but I never considered that it could reduced the need to limit Israel.

So what’s the endgame here? Clearly Palestinians will not disappear into thin air.

You’re right of course. However, is letting Israel kill some hundreds of civilians every week really an option?

There is a long list of alternatives that starts with a military intervention to stop the genocide, and ends with relocating the refugees in other countries as the minimum act of decency. Somehow the world manages to go to the bottom of the list and digs down choosing to just watch.

I wonder how this will be explained in history books.

If the world lets Israel take Gaza, I do not understand why there is no action to relocate the Palestinians and avoid the massacre at least.

I will never understand how the world never punished Israel for what it did to the Palestinians.

And I’m not even talking about the last couple of years.

Today: do it to protect the kids.

Tomorrow: de-anonymise the internet for mass surveillance.

Later: yep… the kids still access adult websites, but that was never the real goal.

What would be the chance that fighting tariffs hitting BigTech would kickstart a tech market in Europe?