

The online safety act isn’t actually about protecting children. That’s a smoke screen for a surveillance bill. They want to eliminate anonymity online.
The online safety act isn’t actually about protecting children. That’s a smoke screen for a surveillance bill. They want to eliminate anonymity online.
A: that’s not really ever been demonstrated to be true for any level of crime. Least of all corruption. The type of people willing to take bribes think they’ll get away with it or don’t consider the consequences.
2: they have that incentive now. Without term limits. That’s a problem we currently face. Term limits won’t change that.
We need to also bar representatives from taking those jobs when they leave office. Which means we also need to give them a pension.
Well all your American made cars just got more expensive. GM and Ford both do most of their manufacturing in Mexico.
Weirdly Hyundai, Kia and Subaru all manufacture cars domestically. So foreign cars are now the cheaper option.
A simple toggle, secured with a password would do it. Child’s device Y/N. If no, proceed. Your browser or whatever app you’re using would only need to see that one setting, and it’s not much different than your browser looking at any number of settings on your device.
Shit with TWO toggles, the other being “is this child under the age of 13?” You could even force sites like YouTube actually to comply with federal law about targeting minors with advertising.
But. These laws aren’t actually about protecting children, they’re about establishing a real identity for every person online.