If you like what I do, send me some Monero:

87ZN8URUY1M6GoXpxou4siDKJkLbLKDhT2RScrauzd4gbRyKgoY2ZX3Ut9WuMtkWebisViSE9EVRzVA1SD4kMdtAUPMiZBC

  • 1 Post
  • 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 11th, 2024

help-circle


  • There is literally not a single useful comment here.

    You have packages from outside the official main repo, in the universe repo.

    You are using a stable Distribution so packages are frozen and need backported security updates.

    You dont get them for the optional universe repos, but if you give them a bit of money (or afaik Ubuntu pro is even free for a few devices) then they will also support these 3rd party packages.

    It is an optional service, they warn you that you use outdated packages, and offer a solution.

    I dont use Ubuntu and Snaps are crap, but this is totally fine.



  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlUbuntu Snap Hate
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • proprietary server (snap store), unlike flatpak
    • snapd only allows one server (but it is foss so you could just patch it), unlike flatpak
    • nonexistent security on snap store, multiple times malware, unlike flatpak
    • no sandboxing without apparmor and specific profiles, so not cross platform, unlike flatpak
    • the system apps are also requiring apparmor, so not cross platform
    • they lack granular permission systems afaik
    • they concur with flatpak, which is horrible as we need a universal packaging format, not 3
    • seemingly no reproducible builds?
    • no separation between all, opensource, verified repo, unlike flatpak
    • they pollute the mount list with all the loop devices

    And people complain abour resource usage etc, but that is just separating apps from the system. Flatpak does the same.