chebra

@captain_aggravated @HiddenLayer555 but those things exist, of course. And they have a name: “Proprietary”

@foremanguy92_ @AnyOldName3 yes, unfortunately, you are wrong. The term “open source” also contains a clause about not restricting the use. Think “open cage”, not just “open book”.

@quick_snail @pdqcp

Public Money? Public Code! https://publiccode.eu/en/

@kureta Did you look in the youtube video description? Or in the top right of their homepage? https://github.com/PixiEditor/PixiEditor

@spez That’s not what open source means.

@dogs0n There is now a great collection of all of these openwashing cases: https://isitreallyfoss.com/

@dogs0n Yeah the license is not open source. It restricts use, modifications and distributions. I thought people in this community would know what the name of the community means.

@dogs0n It’s not open source

@pastermil @nicgentile
cal.com - supposedly AGPL core with proprietary “enterprise” code in specific directories, but the open source doesn’t even build without the enterprise code.

@davel You are confidently incorrect on both counts, but that’s to be expected. Stay classy.

@davel notably, we are not in China. Are you also going to claim that DeepSeek isn’t censored?

If you don’t see any protests in a democracy, it’s not because everybody is happy.

@yet_another_commie

> just like every other state in the world

Really? Let’s talk about Tiananmen Square. Or how about Uyghurs. Let’s use a picture of Winnie the Pooh. Is it really “just like” every other state? I’d say it’s a little bit above the average. People’s democracy my ass. Just because trump turned USA authoritarian didn’t make China less authoritarian.