Is it really antisemitic if a billionaire does it? /s

i think the verb was concentrate, concentrate them into a sort of city or other temporary housing.

Farm workers are chronically underpaid. Farm work could be good work if it was half as stressful and paid double.

What we need is a reform of the way that agriculture is done. Instead of relying on migrant workers who have no realistic chance of standing up and demanding a good treatment, the working conditions should be made attractive enough for americans to work there again.

is the defenestration supposed to be a metaphor for something? i.e., they took too many risks and “leaned out the window too far and fell over” or sth 🤔

tax the rich! (slight /s)

what i’m wondering is:

who exactly wanted this war? i.e., i guess it was not a single-person decision. probably a number of oligarchs are behind it because they think they can profit from either the conflict or the outcome of it.

everybody knows that wars are hella expensive. i guess most wars are decided by economic factors, i.e. who can stay solvent longer. what did the oligarchs think would happen to their wealth due to the war?

these people quote whatever the fuck pleases them today.

the bible literally says to feed the poor and house the homeless and these fucks don’t mention it with a word

it’s literally just a way to manipulate lots of people in whatever way the rulers prefer

Israel does not have a future after this. They’re removing their own credibility, and the world knows it. They’re nothing but a rogue state at this point, waiting to be put to sleep like a rabid dog.

Like a dying star undergoing supernova. A rampant destruction at the end.

Might become surprisingly relevant as fireworks and other explosives could be used in an attack on ICE vehicles and infrastructure.

no they were spot on. it just takes a while for the change to take effect in the outside world.

The article is well-written. I wonder how many employees will still be needed in 10+ years from now.

In case you haven’t heard about it, the labor market is regulated by supply and demand. That means, if there’s less demand, but supply stays equal, wages decline. That’s what people experience for the last decades. If this trend continues, demand for human labor might become very weak. That’s why people for one can no longer rely only on the incomes through the labor (wages), but need good safety nets (Universal Basic Income, UBI).

And also, demand for labor is another way of saying “how much are humans needed to perform tasks”. What if humans aren’t needed? Will people be ok with that?

Short notice that kyivindependent.com is certainly not neutral on this.

it’s a trade-off. the average generation curve depends on the inclination; each has its pros and cons

Kann man das als Österreicher auch unterzeichnen?

Well i’ve used it multiple times to draft articles that i write and also to ask it about information that would otherwise be difficult to find.

and it’s sooo good. it saves me so much time. a lot of information is just really really hard to find if you don’t already know the keyword that you are looking for. a lot of queries is just a loose idea, and if the machine just knows what i mean instead of expecting me to use an arcane keyword for it, that really brings me forward.

I kinda assume that insect-dying is mostly perpretated by taking all of their land away and drying up the wetlands.

I.e., hundreds of years ago, the world had 300 Million people on it. Now we have close to 10 billion, up by a factor of 30x.

That means we consume more food. Even with better soil fertility, we need more land.

That automatically and necessarily leads to a displacement of other species. Turns out that not only humans need land to live, but so does every other species. If you take that land away from them, they die. Simple as that.

I assume that it will be very difficult or close to impossible to do anything against large-scale insect dyings as long as humans take up so much space to produce food. Of course, insular areas can be reserved for wildlife to make sure that some native species survive, but it’s only a small patch to conserve the species, not a large-scale spread of insects across the land. At least that’s my view of it. It’s not so much the chemicals that are poisoning our insects (that too, but it’s not the biggest contributor), but simply the fact that we till so much soil every autumn/winter, that it disrupts insects breeding in that soil.