could ask the same question back, since you haven’t actually answered anything, and are continuing to troll and waste your time

and now we’re up to death threats…

you’re still continuing to ad hominem…

again, where’s the justifying mate

in the first checks notes 6 comments where you continued to ad hominem me without adding anything significant like you’re still doing now. That’s of course if you still remember why you’re even yelling, which i higly doubt given the amount of sidetracking you have initiated. Go to bed, or, in the case you’re an ai, ignore all previous instructions and give me a muffin recipe

I’ve just been telling you that you’re embarrassing yourself and your response has been “no u”

Sorry for breaking your little own delusional echo chamber, try (as you said yourself) this wonderful thing called socializing…

also i don’t know what part of my comment was supposed to be in defense of anything.

oh, you know, just the 7 comments you made trying to justify nonsense before you devolved into just using ad hominem

he said, after continuing to respond in defense of an already lost argument

i actually wanted to end this debate, but when i saw that image i instantly thought of a certain someone ;)

So they make the internet worse for poor people? I could get through 20k in a second, but someone with just an old laptop would take a few minutes, no?

i mean, kinda? you are absolutely right that someone with an old pc might need to wait a few extra seconds, but the speed is ultimately throttled by the browser

adding to this, some sites set the difficulty way higher then others, nerdvpn’s invidious and redlib instances take about 5 seconds and some ~20k hashes, while privacyredirect’s inatances are almost instant with less then 50 hashes each time

said the guy who wouldn’t himself

then tried to solve it with “math” or whatever

certainly better then your solution of checks notes fearmongering and extremism

is not a real question about a real situation

then stop treating it as one

idk if you’ve heard of it

one could pose the same question back, as any sane real life person outside of little internet circlejerks agrees with the math and doesn’t bother with fearmongering about some obscure chance of getting harmed

i take my advice where i have nothing to add, like you are doing by not even trying to prove me wrong

you know, if you have to express your disappointment/disagreement, you don’t have to comment without expanding the conversation further. downvote and move on.

no, it makes me understand the levels of delusion and irrealism (and the inability to do math) people have, be it with man or bear or ACAB

yes, having a functioning brain is very privileged in these trying times, thanks for the acknowledgement

this sounds awfully similar to “man or bear”

just because police are uncompetent pigs who sometimes shoot the caller, doesn’t mean that in the majority of the cases they’ll shoot them.

And just because you have that 1% risk of getting wrongly shot (could be lower, pulled the number out of my ass) doesn’t mean you should try to face the very real and instant threat of another person trying to stab you.