Nah I understand that, I just don’t think politicians even have time to come up with campaign ads when the timeline is so short. Maybe I’m wrong.

The crazy snap elections many eu countries have seem like such a better idea now that we’re in the age of misinformation. Just “pop” we’re voting next week. Don’t even give baddies the chance to fuck your election.

Uhhhhh. Yeah, yeah they are. lol. Like, what a weird thing to claim.

I’m not talking about being able to run on those other hardware. I’m talking about Nintendo devs literally being able to write code for that other hardware. You expand to numerous platforms you get more bugs. You need more devs. You need devs that know more platforms. It has nothing to do with Nintendo gimmicks. It has to do with building for more platforms just by default being more buggy (which is exactly what happens).

Nintendo’s exclusives likely wouldn’t work as well on other consoles or would show significant bugs or problems. Their games are purpose built for their hardware.

Yeah totally. Sucks for sure

Yeah agreed. I just don’t see how you exclude them without unintended consequences.

So paid would include the owners (if it’s an llc or similar), it would include anyone sent by the owners even if it’s not their job title, etc.

I’m pretty sure you can request all that information as well, with a FOIA request.

Seborga is a real place though. And they totally think they’re their own independent nation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seborga

So what defines corporate? What defines paid? You’re excluding mom and pop shops and even medium sized businesses from your definition. How are lawmakers supposed to know if their law is gonna harm specific industries if businesses can’t tell them?

The article states they were released.

That would outlaw scientists lobbying the government to stop things like global warming and pollution. It would stop mom and pop shops from lobbying against things that are good for massive corps but bad for them.

Wait, but they were released?

Your numbers are so far off as to be meaningless. If the real numbers are half that, and you compare to their competitors, then it’s an entirely different story. The numbers you provide are completely integral to your argument, and your numbers being so wrong means you’re just complaining about nothing.

You’ve missed their point.

I thought we do know the depth of the bunkers though. And that American bombs can’t go that deep, even multiple of them