I got one more:
would I care if someone held Kilmeade responsible in an extrajudicial way?

And this is how stochastic terrorism works 👿

https://xkcd.com/verizon/ ?

Yah, it’s the difference between 1/320 and 1/320%

1 million is a faction of what the reality will be. There are roughly 320 million people, 1 million people is about 0.003% of the population.

It’s more like 0.3%, but I fear your assessment regarding the estimate being off will become reality.

How long until someone calls for the dissolution of Elon Musk?
That would be inappropriate, but people get desperate.

That I can agree with!
After all each Palestinian (who isn’t Hamas) who died at the hands of IDF just for being Palestinian deserves a minute of silence whereas I’m already quite satisfied by Charly Kirk being silent henceforth.
Adding other oppressed groups to these minutes of silence would be fine.
And that is what it boils down to: people like Kirk aren’t being oppressed, they’re oppressors. They don’t deserve minutes of silence, but being silenced for good.

The first amendment is prohibiting the government from restricting free speech.
I, as an individual, can want to restrict speech of racist assholes as much as I feel the need to.
I am who decides what is hate speech as much as hate preachers decide spewing their bullshit is ok.
Why should I play by different rules?

I’m not the state so I’m not bound to free speech amendments.
I see hate speech and I want it silenced - simple as that.

People who abuse the idea of free speech to advocate for robbing others of their basic human rights play a stupid game and may win stupid prizes; even if those prizes aren’t dealt out by the state.

How many minutes of silence would that cause per minute?
Or are you only interested in silence for popular Nazis?

And that is why he deserved what he got. If you can’t silence these dangerous types of people by legal means, all that’s left is vigilante justice.
There’s a reason drug cartels resolve their issues with violence: the legal system doesn’t work for them.

Find the praise, find the sickos.

Only a dead Nazi is a good Nazi.
And that is more than just a slogan.
In my mind it stems from the realization that those who don’t honour the social contract forfeit any protection granted by it.
Take it or leave it, but don’t cherry-pick.
If you hate on people and want them dead, well, guess what other people may think of your right to live?

I heard he was a drug dealer and got taken out by the competition.
But I don’t believe everything I hear.

Why limit it to the US?
Could’ve been related to Venezuelan drug lords.

My thoughts exactly.

And just like in the case Luigi became popular for, the overwhelming reaction to this kind of self-defense could’ve been foreseen.

You don’t win against bullies by adhering to the social contract; they break the social contract, you need to do the same.

Can’t they just pin it on Luigi?
They did exactly that to him before, why not again?
Just because he’s in custody?
Mollycoddles!

A stopped clock…
…a broken one not neccessarily.

The news about that is even older: https://archive.nytimes.com/dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/10/21/coals-link-to-global-warming-explained-in-1912/

Alas, a lot people have already lost an arm and a leg and there’s still no end in sight.