• smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Didn’t it already reach the threshold last year and the government (or the civil servant in charge of rejecting every petition) closed it saying that current consumer protection laws already apply?

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      They didn’t close it. They provided an answer early. That as they see it, existing trade and consumer law should cover games and they don’t plan on carving out extra legislation for it but they will “keep an eye on it”.

      Now it is over 100k, it doesn’t actually mean anything more than they “might” debate it in parliament.

      Now, don’t get me wrong. I signed the petition, and I think they SHOULD look into it. But, my old cynical bones tell me that even if they do have a debate in parliament. It will be at a time when there will be 5 MPs in there, who will have nothing to say on the matter and it will be swept under the rug with a further canned statement drawn up by some civil servant in whitehall talking about consumer law just like the statement before.

      Most western governments are on the side of industry, and that includes game developers. I cannot imagine they care about this subject and will do the bare minimum lip service to move past it.

      I hope I’m wrong.

      I do have a bit more hope for the European parliament. Just a little. They do seem to be a bit more pro-consumer. That is the one that matters most IMO.

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      My understanding is that they misunderstood the petition, so this new one is rephrased in an attempt to avoid another misinterpretation

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Politicians seem very good at misunderstanding things when it suits them.