Was there a statement from either of them on why? I know why is really the hardest answer to get from someone but did they just hate the tree. Did their sisters turn down a marriage proposal from them at that site?
One claimed he was so drunk he doesn’t remember loading up his range rover, driving to the parking spot then carrying the equipment to the tree, cutting it down with precision not expected of someone blind drunk, carried all the kit back to the car, drive home then had a moment of clarity.
The other one said he’s such a weak idiot that the other one led him astray
You should look up some of the messages the court case revealed.
They took joy in making people miserable. They knew targeting a loved cultural landmark would make people angry and miserable, so that’s what they did.
Their motivation was purely to hurt.
No motive other than being sad losers who wanted the fake glory of being the one to chop down a beloved tree.
these men aren’t a danger to the public and aren’t likely to do it again, there is no legitimate reason for a prison sentence
just give them a very long period of community service, maybe tree relatedThe sentencing is to slow that wilful destruction of ancient trees and heritage sites will not go unpunished.
They are a pair of cunts that destroyed a beloved tree and I disagree, if they hadn’t been jailed, they would very likely do something similar again seeing as they revelled in the media attention and took keepsakes.
i both hate these pricks for killing the tree and am ideologically biased against at least one of them because he’s a petite-bourgeois scumbag and i still believe that they wouldn’t be stupid enough to do something similar again
having them perform service for the community is cheaper, improves the community, and takes the sheen off their notoriety if they do indeed still revel in the attention
prison as a punishment is backwards medieval thinking, it should be reserved purely for people who are a genuine danger to the public or are extremely likely to repeat their crime
Cool, now do the same for Water Company executives that shit all over our nature as well.
nope. only for charismatic megaflora/fauna
nope. only for
charismatic megaflora/faunathe poors.FTFY
Very, very, very harsh. Too harsh.
Would love to see just a single one of the besuited cunts who are polluting our rivers and air get this kind of treatment by their mates in the courts. Never gonna happen tho - this has been a rich man’s world for centuries.
From what I understand, they really fucked around the court and lied about it which is why the sentence is harsh. If they had just admitted it, they probably would have got a suspended sentence.
i disagree with this being too harsh, but do agree with the second point about wishing to see this type of punishment extended to the industrial villains, who will never see it, deserving this type of punishment.
That’s fair. I understand the frustration and anger at these two and what they did - it was senseless and I was definitely a bit heartbroken to read about the felling at first - but four years is so long and they’re going to come out worse for it, in my opinion.
I don’t think that’s possible, even most criminals would look down on these two.
Not that they had much going for them to begin with. Maybe when they get out they’ll use their brains to do something constructive
Like organ donation
We’re in the middle of a prison crisis. We don’t have room for people who chopped down a tree, even if it was a really pretty one.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2dlr05rr1lo
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/anglian-water-fined-300-000-after-pollution-killed-5-000-fish
Not one CEO properly held accountable by the law (I could have listed another 30 different cases easily. Just searching polluted river and killed fish fined uk)
“this kind of treatment” meaning harsh sentences. Fining a company means very little 🤷♂️
My point was that individuals have been responsible for a lot worse, but never held accountable. It didn’t have to be rivers and fish. I could have linked to the endless other articles referring to the destruction of something. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmjj5gl6m0po
Councils are constantly cutting down trees. https://inews.co.uk/news/trees-felled-uk-councils-10-years-3229184?ito=link_share_article-top
Oh right, I read your comment as sarcastic but it seems like we’re saying the exact same thing.
Nope. They’re a pair of cunts that deserve longer and it’s not a zero sum game. We can, and should, have be jailing both
4 years!
Of course it’s fucked up and whatever, but this feels like a populist sentence. 4 years is an incredibly long time. In what way is this adequate for the crime. Like mentioned before, there is infinite damage being done to nature in the name of business, very rarely somebody is getting a little bit of blowback, and these two guys, who really don’t have much potential to destroy anything more are sent away as an example? To whom? The generally misbehaving public?
This was deliberate, planned, and done purely to destroy something others enjoyed.
I’d say it’s about right.
Is building a housing estate on a green belt or a park not deliberate, planned, and done purely to destroy something others enjoyed?
In what way is this adequate for the crime
What is the maximum sentence for damage of public property?
Cool yeah, let’s have short sentences for destroying cultural landmarks. I’m sure that’ll be fine.
We both know that these men will, unfortunately, be out far sooner than 4 years time.
They shouldn’t be inside at all. We don’t have the prison space to spend on things like this. It should be dealt with in the community.
How, exactly, would one do that? Especially considering these men seem to have no community spirit whatsoever?
Then make space.
We already jail more than France, Germany, Austria, Spain, Italy, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland. We’re about 40% more than the nearest one of those which is France. Several of them we’re 2-3x more per capita.
We put too many people in prison. We’re not on American levels, but it’s still too many.
I.e. translating to no real punishment. For permanently destroying a historically significant site, then constantly lying in court.
I’m sure there would be zero repercussions from that.
Jesus Christ, I am immensely thankful you aren’t a judge or legislator.
Get them in the stocks to be pelted by tomatoes by the community
Not quite what I was thinking, but better than 4 years a piece.
a 150 year sentence for killing a 150 year old tree would be nice
Given a sycamore can like for 500 years although 300 is more common.
If that the maths we follow. Potential life lost to the tree of 350 years is more reasonable.
Multiply by 2.5 given the celebrity status of the tree.
Definitely not harsh enough. They should have gotten AT LEAST 12 years each. And even that could never make up the damage they have done. 12 is too mild, 4 entirely laughable.
For what?
All they done is… Cut a tree.
Think about it for a sec. Just a tree.
Tree surgeons do this on a daily basis
Of course this is nonwithstanding other environmental crimes should be prosecuted, just as hard.
You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about
You obviously don’t. You were advocating for practically zero punishment for it, and find incessant lying in court to be completely fine too.
I’m immensely glad you’re not involved in the justice system or legislation. What a fucking disaster that would be. A criminal free-for-all.
I wasn’t advocating for zero punishment. But what damage has been done that justifies 4 years prison, let alone 12?
Intentionally destroying a national landmark, that’s what. And it seems to be done purely for the sake of it.
Your comments on this don’t reflect well on your intelligence, I must say.
I forgive you too, brother
deleted by creator
corpos rape the planet: giggling sunflower
two dudes kill a tree: angry sunflower
