• klu9@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Malicious compliance:

    • “Are you too old to have flown on the Lolita Express with Epstein and Trump?”
    • “Are you young enough to be employed as a ‘towel girl’ at the Mar a Lago massage parlour?”
  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is bullshit. It should be on mississippi to block the sites or require local isps to block them. The providers are on the internet and not going out to be in mississippi. Places should wall themselves off if they can’t handle the internet.

    • crank0271@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re right. Imagine having to put more resources into Mississippi than Mississippi puts into anything.

      How would other countries have responded if instead of building The Great Firewall, China had demanded each international company not allow Chinese citizens within China to access certain parts of their websites?

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah what you have at the end is sorta my thought line. You want to go all censorship at least get off your ass and do it yourself.

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Or - hear me out here - it shouldn’t be on anybody to do anything because the law itself is garbage and should not exist.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        But the question is, what would be a reasonable legal principle for preventing such laws generally? Mississippi is going to pass bullshit laws, but it shouldn’t be possible for the jurisdiction of any state to be anything on the entire internet.

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It should fall on the parents and ISPs should have an opt in option to block adult websites.

        But we all know this is more about control and data harvesting than anything else.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Psssshhhh!!! Get outta here with that solid logic, and critical thinking! We don’t use reasoning in this country! We just cry and scream until everybody ELSE caves to the demands!

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Have any of Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord implemented age-checks in Mississippi then?

    If not, why is Bluesky the only one going dark there?

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t understand. Does an instance hosted anywhere outside of this US backwater state have anything to fear from this? Why is Eugen being contacted all the way in Germany?

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’re primarily in Germany but there is some US presence too. From the join Mastodon site:

      Mastodon, Inc. (EIN 92-3333630) is a 501©(3) non-profit entity in the United States that supports the growth and operational capabilities of Mastodon, including being able to receive tax-deductible U.S. donations and in-kind support.

      Oops