

I mean there is he dialectic. I have had arguments were as the person restates their meaning it sorta seems like we are saying the same thing but there is some nuance on language that we seem to be hung up on. Like it seems the idea is the same but we just can’t rely on the appropriate language to express it. Its hard to describe because it only happens once in awhile and I will sometimes be like. You know we are sorta saying the same thing but oftentimes the person just gets more annoyed and will sorta double down on the language and usually I just give up at that point.
This does not seem surprising to me:
“Overall, the developers in the study accepted less than 44 percent of the code generated by AI without modification. A majority of the developers reported needing to make changes to the code generated by their AI companion, and a total of 9 percent of the total task time in the “AI-assisted” portion of the study was taken up by this kind of review.”
It sounds about right. The AI should be acting as an assistant. The big question to me is if the code that comes out 19% slower is at all of higher quality. Since the coder is doing more correction and review does it act a bit like a second set of eyes or a pho sort of collaboration. If so it could still be helpful. Granted my experience so far is that most of what it does can be done with plugins to an ide but like it is sorta handy to have it all set and going after an installation without having to find and start using the plugins. Im still worried about energy usage with these things but hoping that can be worked out and honestly im not sure if the energy usage for something integrated with an ide or such is as bad.