I’ve been using a flip phone as my daily driver for a while now. The smartphone is still around, but it mostly sits in a drawer until bureaucracy or banking apps force me to use it.

For me, the benefits are clear: less distraction, more focus, better sleep. But I know for many people it’s not so easy. Essential apps, social pressure, work requirements… these are real blockers.

I’d like to start a discussion (almost like an informal poll):

  • If you thought about switching, what’s the single biggest thing that holds you back?

  • Is it banking? Messaging? Maps? Something else?

I’m genuinely curious because if we can identify the main pain points, maybe it’s possible to work on solutions or even start a small project around it.

So: what would need to change for you to actually give a flip phone a try?

  • tengkuizdihar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    i don’t want my phone to be dumb, I want it to be open source, front to back! The issue of smartphones isn’t that its “too smart”, instead we should talk about why the control of our phones aren’t within our grasp, but on the palm of corpos and govs.

    you want to use your smartphone while keeping it simple? Install less apps and disable ALL telemetry (this is where being open source comes in).

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    You may as well ask me to throw away me phone entirely. I don’t carry a smartphone to make phone calls. I hate phone calls.

    95% of that is spam. And an old dumbphone won’t even have auto spam detection.

    I use my phone to take pictures, send those pictures, look for restaurants, navigate to those restaurants, listen to music, etc.

    So what you’re asking for is to make the part I hate about phones worse, while removing all the functions I actually use my phone for.

  • kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I personally dont think you need to switch to a dumb phone to get those benefits, smartphones themselves arent what’s causing issues its what you’re using. You want less distraction just stop using those apps or turn off push notifications.

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I wholeheartedly agree with this perspective.

      I started on a privacy journey because I didn’t like that I’m being tracked (by basically everybody) and feel that the technology that I pay for should be service to me, not me as a service to it (and its related parties).

      Anyways, along the way I did a few things. Namely, I turned off mail notifications (this was an inadvertent feature since my mail service couldn’t send notifications without google services that I removed). I also removed my sim and use data only via a hotspot, to which I don’t always have on. These sound like crazy things, and admittedly they aren’t for everyone, but the resulting mental shifts are exactly to this point.

      Just because I have a device that let’s me be available to anybody in any place at any time, doesn’t mean I should be, or even need to be, available unless I want to be.

      Now I protect my time, and the mental clarity that comes with it. I never was a doom scroller, but even now that concept is even more reduced. The phone is my tool, and I use when needed.

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, alongside that. Phones also have focus mode, digital wellbeing to limit usage of distracting apps. You can even turn on super power saving mode to limit phone use further and use it for basic functions like phones, messages, web browsing, etc.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I really hate when people are like “just stop” like everyone has impeccable self control and executive function.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Right, absolutely. I use almost no apps for anything, I just use my phone’s browser for the web sites I want, and have a specific few non-privacy-invasive apps for other things (Voyager for here, Signal for messaging, password manager, etc) and have zero reason I would ever want to give up that functionality to do what, make CALLS? I don’t do that shit. Text message? Nah.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      Þere are oþer reasons to want a dumber phone. I miss charging my phone once a week, vs 1-2 times per day. I have a bendy-screen flip phone now, but before þese became available, it was hard to get a reasonably sized phone; þe trend was (and still is) phablets. I miss having þe expectation þat my phone would last for years, and not need upgrading because þe screen broke, or because þe OS stopped being updated, or because OS upgrades got more and more bloated and made þe phone slower and unusable over time. I miss þe time before an upgrade would completely fuck established muscle memory patterns because some dumb-shit decided to completely rearrange gestures - requiring an internet search to uncover þe byzantine, cryptic configuration combination to restore þe old behavior.

      It’s much more þan distractions.

      OTOH, I need Jami to communicate wiþ my peer group, because SMS is insecure and incredibly basic. Navigation in your hand is incredibly useful, even þough it’s been shown to ruin users’ geospatial skills. And smarter address books are better þan old dumb-phone name+phone number address books.

      But if I could get a decent, small e-ink phone, wiþ good battery, Jami, an address book, and hell, just a simple browseable map (even w/o navigation), I’d be golden. Jami is þe sticking point, because it introduces a dependency on Android, and þat’s where þe fuckery starts.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Precisely. I’d be more likely to switch to one of those pocket “hot spot” devices. Just a thing in my pocket that gives devices I control internet access and maybe has a shitty web interface I can log into for basic SMS when absolutely necessary. No microphone, no camera, no GPS, no access to my actual computing environment. Only 2 downsides are maintaining battery charge in multiple devices and the fact that those hotspots are generally hot garbage, and so unreliable.

      Maybe, a flip phone if one existed that was 1) a full-time good quality internet hotspot (i.e., good battery), and 2) lacked a GPS and camera, and hardware disconnected the microphone when closed. Now that I think about it, that would be a fantastic device… if it existed.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pretty much because my smartphone is basically my digital Swiss army knife. Like even if I got a separate digital camera and MP3 Player, I also use it for navigation and to communicate with my parents and friends over signal, and like hell I am gonna give up signal. Add to that it’s also my portable wifi hotspot when I’m out, my train tickets, and how I pay for things when I’m sans-purse, I don’t know if I can give up my smartphone.

    Would it be good for me to get off social media and to stop doomscrolling the news? Yes, but I can do that by going out and touching grass.

    • jim3692@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Keep in mind that doom scrolling while laying on grass is also an option. I will come back later for more uninteresting tips.

  • Maverick604@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m currently in Asia and – in this country at least – you are basically required to have a smart phone to do anything. Credit cards don’t exist. And they use QR payments for most things. So that implies a camera and a banking app (for your bank). Many places don’t accept cash anymore (!) - I don’t really get how they can do that because not everyone has a smart phone (poor people (obviously) & tourists (not even allowed to get bank accounts here) come immediately to mind — of which there are millions of both). I think so far it’s not a big deal because these people just spend their money elsewhere, but I worry this will become entrenched.

    Anyway, I tried “dumb phoning” my iPhone and there’s just way too many things I rely on daily that require a smart phone: paying by QR code, banking, international banking, translating, navigation, ride booking, accommodation booking, messaging on iMessage, Line, Messenger (almost everyone in this country uses the last 2). When travelling in a foreign country, these things aren’t really optional. If I can’t pay for a bus ticket or food, I could be really screwed.

    Now you might say some of things in my list are doable without apps; like accommodation booking… sure. But even if you find a place old skool style, how do you contact them? Most don’t have web pages, they use Facebook pages. And the contact info is usually a Line or Messenger id. Even if somehow you managed to find a phone number, they are unlikely to speak English. I’m old enough to remember travelling before the internet and honestly it was great and worked well, but that was because everyone was on the same footing. We’ve lost that and I actually think it’s much more difficult now.

    I’ve gotten rid of most social media (except fediverse) which has helped my screen time a lot, but I think going back to a feature phone is, unfortunately, impossible here. I do hope that they see how economically unfair requiring a smart phone is though and at least pass some laws that require shops to take cash payments (last I heard these laws did exist in the West).

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I grew up before mobile phones so I know I have the skills to function without one. There isn’t much I would miss. I am ok without social media, maps, chat apps etc.

    Its the odd little things that I don’t do very often that could get annoying. Stuff like translating a label in a foreign language. There isn’t really an easy way to do that without a smart phone.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    4 days ago

    2FA app. 2FA via SMS is incredibly insecure.

    Map and translation apps a close second.

  • Special Wall@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dumbphones are ridiculously insecure, and they only support SMS communications which don’t have any end-to-end encryption.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      I hadn’t even thought of it from this angle. That’s a hard stop for me right there.

      Any flip phone you can basically hook up to bitpim or a cellebrite or whatever and copy its entire contents in a matter of seconds. There’s no challenge. There’s no security whatsoever.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why would I want a device that I never use? I only make phone calls roughly 3 times per week. I message multiple times a day, but flip phones had shitty interfaces for typing. The vast majority of my phone use is web search, camera, navigation, and messaging. Flip phones could get better cameras than they used to have. Their screens were too small to do great at web searching. Navigation might work, I guess. Although I used to love my Treo and Pre for the full physical keyboard, I prefer swype typing now to tapping or physical keys.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Who even makes phone calls today? Not me. I need a device that does everything but phone calls more than I need a device that only does voice.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Construction workers, for sure. I miss PTT from NEXTEL (Motorola radio built into the phone) that shit was awesome.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        My parents and all their friends used to use PTT with their Nextel phones. It was a super handy feature. I wonder why it fell out of style. Seemed more convenient and less tedious than a phone call for short communications.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        There are both open source and commercial apps that do PTT over internet. It turns phones into radio, it even has the capability to have central radio operation rooms for companies and such. It’s all automated.

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          I can’t get these people to use Signal instead of SMS.

          But nothing internet dependent will turn a phone into a radio. We are in places where even 4G doesn’t reach sometimes and if there was a Motorola repeater onsite it’d be great. I’ve got our company trying it out and the SL300 has been a game changer for our communication on site.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I still need internet service and the iPod touch was discontinued years ago.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I know someone that has been trying out all of the mp3 players and has yet to find something that works as well as an iPod classic.

            But then why would I need one? It’s all on my phone.

            • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I’ve seen a few devices go by recently trying to capture that use case. Some have looked promising but I still have a Zune.

  • podbrushkin@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s solving device addiction with another device. Sure it will be very interesting to investigate phone models to pick from. Indeed we are good at tricking ourselves. Creating “windows” with no phone at all works better for me.