A new study published in the journal Sexuality & Culture has found that many adolescents in Spain, including those as young as 12, are not only aware of OnlyFans but also see it as a viable and even empowering way to make money. In group discussions with over 160 teenagers, researchers discovered that platforms promoting erotic content are influencing how young people—especially girls—view economic opportunity, self-worth, and sexuality. Teens frequently framed content creation as a personal choice or expression of agency, while minimizing the risks.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The problem is the people worshipping, polytheistic nature of Christianity

    Christianity isn’t polytheistic

    the addition of purgatory

    That’s not Christian doctrine

    so fuck around, you’ll never find out! And Jesus “died for your sins” either way, whatever that means

    This is because the Christian God is infinitely merciful

    and Islam (without nonsensical, heretical hadiths and superficial a-Quranic traditions) is good Christianity +1. If you read, you’ll understand. 👍

    I read the first three surahs of the Qur’an in full and some smaller segments here and there. To me, it really comes off as “this is a companion book to the bible”

    • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, it is polytheistic, but let’s just agree to disagree on that one. And mercy requires justice, and justice implies judgment. God is Merciful and Just, of course! Jesus preached that one had to repent and correct their behaviour to be accepted by God, you can’t just be an unrepentant sinner, a troublemaker, a violent rapey murderous racist or even just a heartless rich man (camels and needles!), and expect God to condone it! How do you judge, my guy?

      A wise man doesn’t need much to understand what’s right and wrong and, honestly, anyone could just read and internalise the Sermon on the Mount and be in good terms with the Creator as it transforms you, but you can’t say that about the whole Bible, which is very internally inconsistent (because it’s a collection of books and letters with different authors, written and edited by power-hungry and immoral men at times). And if you’re clever, you could do that just with Ecclesiastes, but Jesus’ message is more… approachable. 👍

      • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You are making a mistake that many sincere believers have made throughout history. You assume your faith is the singular, correct one, and that outsiders only need to open their hearts to see the “one true path.” What often goes unnoticed is that there has never been one true religion. You believe yours is correct because that is what faith requires. But history shows us that as soon as a faith gathers enough followers, disagreements arise. Some argue that leaders have misinterpreted the sacred texts, or that local customs conflict with established rituals. Whatever the reason, division follows. A religion grows, it fractures, sects emerge, and each insists it is the sole guardian of truth. Repeat this pattern over generations, and what began as unity splinters into dozens of sects, often hostile to one another.

        Religion does what many of its adherents claim it does not: it changes. It bends, adapts, and evolves in response to pressure and environment. It speciates.

        So let me ask you, as one who seeks to understand: if I were to study your holy book and choose Islam, which path should I walk? Should I follow Sunni, risking alienating Shia? If I found myself drawn to the Wahhabi or the Druze? Would these choices lead to peace and enlightenment or would they create yet another division? And if I sought to share my newfound belief with those raised differently, would they welcome my unity, or view me as another intruder cloaking sameness as love and peace?

        This is why I, and many others, argue for pluralism. There can never be a single “true way,” for as long as people are individuals, there will always be differences in interpretation, values, and belief. History shows that tribalism, insularity, and suspicion of the unfamiliar are constants of human nature. The only way forward is not to cling to unity under nation or creed, but to accept each other as we are. Only by setting aside the conceit of a universal faith can we begin to overcome the divisions that have defined us.

        • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Thanks for the very lovely and informative post. I agree with what you’re saying and, as a Qur’anist/non-sectarian Muslim, I don’t have much of a ‘community’ myself, sadly, and I’m often demonized by other Muslims online more than folks on Lemmy, lol. 🤷

          I take what’s good and disregard what makes no sense, but I have found the Qur’an to be extremely useful and hard to disagree with. Even what you’re saying could arguably be found in the Qur’an : “righteousness is not facing the East or the West” (the belief is not superficial rituals that differ amongst tribes); believers are those who “have humility, abstain from vain talk, guard their chastity except around their mates, but whoever seeks beyond this are the transgressors” (it’s an attitude thing, not just words on paper and rites). I quote previous Scripture and will even yap about Daoism and Western philosophy because wisdom comes from many places (although, as a self-proclaimed Muslim, I take the Qur’an as axiomatic, of course). As long as you strive to control yourself and try to live righteously and generously, I honestly don’t care what you call yourself, you are my brother/sister, and judgment beyond that belongs to the Creator. 🙏👍

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean, it is polytheistic

        The first thing we declare is that “We believe in One God”

        And mercy requires justice, and justice implies judgment. God is Merciful and Just, of course! Jesus preached that one had to repent and correct their behaviour to be accepted by God, you can’t just be an unrepentant sinner, a troublemaker, a violent rapey murderous racist or even just a heartless rich man (camels and needles!), and expect God to condone it! How do you judge, my guy?

        God doesn’t forgive unrepentant sinners. God only forgives those who truly and earnestly repent. God doesn’t forgive based off of works either- because then where is the line? And God can only forgive because our sins have been paid. If our sins haven’t been paid off, then God would be unjust.

        honestly, anyone could just read and internalise the Sermon on the Mount and be in good terms with the Creator as it transforms you, but you can’t say that about the whole Bible

        Works don’t save you. Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

        The sermon on the mount teaches that you’re damned if you ever looked at a woman you aren’t married to with lust or if you even hate somebody.

        And your screenshot, If you scrolled down on your article, you’d clearly see it is exclusively a Roman Catholic doctrine.

        • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If you’re not Trinitarian and think Jesus, a man, is part of this small pantheon, then what I said does not apply to you (and that’s fantastic!). And only works can save you (and we can’t know the line, that’s God’s judgment, we just do our best and hope for the best. Don’t you believe God is Wise, Just and Merciful?), as the words are supposed to be transformative: “Now someone may argue, “Some people have faith; others have good deeds.” But I say, “How can you show me your faith if you don’t have good deeds? I will show you my faith by my good deeds.” You say you have faith, for you believe that there is one God. Good for you! Even the demons believe this, and they tremble in terror.” If you say you believe in A but only do B and don’t regret it and change, you’re just a hypocrite, right? And I don’t disagree with the Sermon on the Mount at all (only the divorce part has to be read with historical context). Is being lustful not sinful? Should a married man be posting fire emojis on Instagram thirst traps? Should we hate others, or even dislike them so casually, when none of us is perfect? Strive not to be damned, and God will see it and take it into account, right?

          I’ll finish by paraphrasing part of my previous post: Christianity today seems to be a religion/group of religions for those who hate the idea of being judged for their actions; it’s for the immature and confused ones who don’t wanna check themselves but still want to be in good terms with God.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you’re not Trinitarian and think Jesus, a man, is part of this small pantheon, then what I said does not apply to you (and that’s fantastic!).

            So mormons?

            And only works can save you (and we can’t know the line, that’s God’s judgment, we just do our best and hope for the best. Don’t you believe God is Wise, Just and Merciful?)

            Yes, which is why sin cannot go unpunished.

            Jesus commands us to “be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Matthew 5:48).

            This was immediately after teaching about lust and anger. He was quite clearly alerting everyone to their sin then and there.

            You then quoted St James. Who clearly teaches that saving faith produces works.

            James 2:21-24 ESV

            Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar? You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works; and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”—and he was called a friend of God. You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.

            We are justified by works. But not saved

            Genesis 15:6 ESV

            And he (Abra(ha)m) believed the Lord, and he counted it to him as righteousness.

            This was before the altar event with Isaac in Genesis 22.

            And since we are quoting St James:

            James 2:8-13

            [8] If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. [9] But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. [10] For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. [11] For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. [12] So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. [13] For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.

            If you break one law, you are damned.

            Romans 6:23

            For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

            Emphasis on “free gift”. We don’t earn our salvation.

            • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s not owed to us because nothing is, every moment of our lives is a gift and Heaven is also a gift, but we make ourselves more pleasing to God through our actions and He, being Merciful, allows us eternal life if we’re good boys and girls. We’re splitting hairs now, friend. If you work good deeds and honestly repent and change our bad ways as much as we can, God will take care of us. That’s the basis of belief regarding the Day of Judgment. That’s all.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                That’s not what Jesus taught. If it’s all about good deeds, then we’re all going to hell. None of us are good. Not one.

                • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  Omg, that’s like the most black and white, Mariana Trench deep-in-the-spectrum way of seeing things… Of course no one is GOOD, “only the Father is good”, but we can be good enough (“strive to be perfect just as your Father is perfect”, knowing full well it’s a limit we’ll never touch). God made us this way, flawed and capable of both great evil and goodness, do you think he’s expecting more of us than reasonable righteousness?

                  If this is just your way of saying “I can’t ever be good enough so why try?”, then that’s your prerogative. There’s no need to rationalize your way into Hell though, God is Just and Merciful, do your best and He’ll be pleased.

                  • Flax@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    We can’t be good enough.

                    do you think he’s expecting more of us than reasonable righteousness?

                    Yes. His standard is perfect.

                    God is Just and Merciful, do your best and He’ll be pleased.

                    If He is Just based on our personal works, then he is sending us all to hell

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            In Christianity the triune god is three aspects of a single being. I know it can be confusing, but it is not polytheistic.

            • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s why I said before “let’s agree to disagree”. A man born from a woman and a Spirit, whatever that might be, both part of this universe cannot also be the Creator that is before and behind spacetime. But whatever, as long as you work good deeds and I work good deeds, we can live together, right?

              • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                That all depends on your personal definition of good deeds. Myself, I don’t think picking arguments about religion online counts.

                • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  I’m preaching here! But honestly, I just politely replied to people’s comments on my post, which is what you’re supposed to do in a discussion forum. 👍