• Panties@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    No earphone jack again. That’s a bit sad. Even though I mainly use BLT earbuds, I still sometimes wish I could use my wired headphones. It’s just a small inconvenience

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      “Modularity” but still no headphone jack, couldn’t I just have a backplate with a big bump on it to accommodate a 3.5mm jack?

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Big? The headphone jack is not large enough to protrude from a cell phone chassis. Any company telling you they can’t fit it is just lying to sell you BT headphones.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              I’m assuming they are removing the headphone jack cause the internal components take up too much space. I can’t imagine these companies removing the jacks cause they cost too much money.

              • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                You’re vastly overestimating the space required for a 3.5mm jack, and the reasons for its removal.

                The jack takes up some internal space, but not much at all. The components required internally like the DAC chip are insignificant. It is a potential source of water ingress, but that can be mitigated and has been done many times before.

                The reason for removal is two fold, first you simply don’t have to deal with any of the above, so from an engineering perspective it’s always easier to not do something. The second, and most important, **is to sell wireless headphones. **

                You’ll notice that Fairphone came out with their own earbuds at the same time they removed the headphone jack. You could of course use Bluetooth headphones with the Fairphone 1, 2, and 3, but you weren’t forced to think about it and could just use your existing headphones. Removing the jack ads inconvenience and breaks user habit, causing people to re-evaluate their headphones and consider a new purchase, which the manufacturer just happens to have and likely in a bundle deal.

                Apple, Google, and Samsung have seen huge uplift in earbud sales with the removal of the jack. So the anger of some power users is of no consequence to them. Seeing Fairphone follow in this behaviour what’s disappointing.

                • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  I made the mistake of believing that Fairphone is an enthusiast company, like the Framework of phones maybe. There is some overlap, sure, with the repair-ability aspect and available parts and schematics, but that’s about it.

                  Other than that, FP wants to be a mainstream brand, the eco-friendly Samsung or Apple; the power users can get shafted with their audio jacks for all they care. While Framework has actual hardware modularity and release updated HW modules so you don’t buy the whole device again for an upgrade.

                  Looking at FP’s financial statements, I get the impression they aren’t doing too hot lately, so I get it if they need bigger margins to continue operating. Just don’t be a fucking hypocrite and lie about the reason of the jack removal ffs.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Not having a headphone jack is just a slap in the face from a company whose whole image is supposed to be longevity and eco-friendly.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        No one has been using aux cable mobile headphones for the past 10 years. Headphone jack is e-waste at this point. bluetooth audio is great and if you really want to be a boomer you can use the usb C headphones.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Headphone jack is e-waste

          you can use the usb C headphones

          What the absolute fuck are you talking about? What am I supposed to do with the dozen wired headphones I already have? Some of them decades old? Throw them in the garbage? Sounds real eco-friendly.

          bluetooth audio is great

          It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

          Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  Okay so now this is my fault. Do you know how many adapters I lost before I needed one?

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

            My 7 years old bluetooth headphone would disagree.

            It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

            And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that, and manufacturer make their decision on that data.

            But lets ignore that, and let’s take my viewpoint as a customer. I don’t want a port I have no use for. I don’t want a DAC I have no use for. I don’t want the extra weight that comes with them.

            My needs conflict with yours, so what’s the only way to make both of us somewhat happy? That’s by making the 3.5mm jack an addon, which is what any manufacturer that does not focus on music listening would do.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that,

              I would love to see the data that says everyone wants wired devices only. I don’t believe you.

              don’t want a port I have no use for.

              Why would you even care!?

              I don’t want the extra weight that comes with them.

              😆 Buddy if you don’t want extra weight you need to talk to these OEMs about making their phones out of giant slabs of glass. A 1g connector isn’t going to make a difference. You’re being completely ridiculous.

              My needs conflict with yours,

              No they don’t. They can meet both of our needs by including a jack. Simple as.

    • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I never use wired headphones even though I have a jack in my phone. But I have never bought a phone without a jack and probably never will.

      Ipersonally think it’s user hostile to remove the jack and also goes directly agains the green profile Fairphone wants to have.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I was just hoping a phone like fairphone would give me the option to buy a small module or something to let me do it.

      Yes, yes there’s adapters … yes, yes, you don’t need to use it … I understand. I just want it.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          I mean … you don’t have to tell me that my opinion isn’t popular, it’s demonstrable. My opinion is statistically insignificant.

          There’s a plethora of other things I’d give up like have a slighter bigger phone or a worse camera or wireless charging… I’d also trade those for an SD card slot but no one agrees with me and it’s just something I need to live with.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced…

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        After having a phone without a 3.5mm port or a microSD card slot, the top 2 features I want on a phone are a 3.5mm port and a microSD card slot.

        Shame Sony discontinued their Xperia 5 series, even if they were also excessively priced.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Honestly, I don’t really get the people who complain about the lack of 3.5mm jack on a smartphone. If you’re looking for quality you’re more likely to get better quality out quality USB-C headphones than quality 3.5mm headphones due to the USB-C headphones picking up less noise and having its own DAC (which is probably better than the phone DAC that 3.5mm would use).

      EDIT: I would’ve been surprised if this take wasn’t controversial. But I guess it’s a good example how the fediverse is not a leftist echo chamber. You have a loud minority complaining about not being able to use a century old technology that the vast majority in the mobile space has moved away from and any compromise on what you want is unacceptable. That’s about as conservative as you can get.

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I don’t follow? If you mean simplicity in terms of ease of use you might as well use BT headphones as you don’t have to worry about any wire management. Ease of use is the main reason BT headphones are the go to for most people. No carefully packing the wires so it won’t break, no accidental wiring mess or anything wire related. You just turn them on (which for most in-ear ones just means taking them out of the case), stick them to your ear and you’re good to go.

          If you meant anything else by simplicity you need to expand that idea.

            • Goodeye8@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              Fair enough, feel free to buy USB-C headphones then.

              Edit: Time for the real reply.

              I never have to charge my wired headphone.

              But you still have to charge your phone. When I charge my phone I also charge my headphones. Most wireless headphones notify you in advance when they’re running low, in my experience enough in advance to not run out before charging again. And finally, charging even once a day is still less overhead than having to manage wires every single time you use the headphones.

              Nor do I have to buy new batteries or new headphones when they die

              Yeah, you only buy new headphones when the wire gets damaged because that one time you didn’t take good enough care of the wire. I personally had to buy a new set of headphones every year because I’m bad with wires. I’d either store them poorly because I was in a hurry or they’d get stuck on something and get yanked. My first BT headphones lasted me 5 years before starting to have noticeable battery issues and then I still used them for another 3 years before the battery was so dead it wouldn’t live my daily commute.

              overall my response boils down to “just use wired then” because the arguments are silly personal preference arguments and the wider consumer market has already decided that wireless is better. But if you want wired nothing is stopping you from getting USB-C wired headphones.

              • warm@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                No consumer decided it would be better without it, there’s literally no reason to defend it’s removal. It doesn’t exist because the phone companies wanted to sell their wireless earbuds, that’s it. Anything else they tell you is bullshit.

                Why are you trying to justify not having it? You can still use your wireless buds if you want if the port exists, you can still use your USB-C earphones or adapter if you’d like. It can exist in harmony along with other features, like it did for decades before capitalism called for more profits.

                • Goodeye8@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  Why aren’t you complaining about the removal of a keyboard? Or the removal of SD card slots? Or the removal or the IR light? Or the notification light? or something else that used to be there but isn’t now. Why is the 3.5mm port so special it deserves constant complaining about almost A DECADE LATER? Why must you be these grumpy old men who can’t fucking move on with the times.

                  I don’t really care if the port is there or not, I’m just fed up with the constant whining about it. It’s gone, the ship has sailed. The majority are more than happy to use wireless headphones, 3.5mm is a niche in the mobile space. There are alternatives if you really like wired headphones. What makes 3.5mm such fucking hill to die on? Nothing. It’s just petty conservatism of people unwilling to move on with the times.

  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    There’s a deGoogled version too!!

    I would prefer GrapheneOS (If I can live with the irony of getting a Pixel phone just to deGoogle it…). Sandboxing there is way better. But you lose the Repairability… Gotta check and compare the new EU metrics too.

    They are just two different devices.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I would totally buy one of these if they were sold in the US. Sadly, last time I checked the newest phone wasn’t sold here. So I doubt this one will be.

  • blunderworld@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    It’s too bad they dont ship to Canada. I’m in the market for a new phone and would seriously consider this.

  • Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    If they are all about swappable parts, and being able to upgrade your phone how you want … Shouldn’t this just be a module upgrade… Of the main part? Maybe I don’t understand it … At the very least the old parts should work with the new system right? Unless something major has changed.