• 反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’m getting extremely angry at these fash headlines.

    Chairman Trump is going to trample 19 sovereignties in order to make his tyrannical dreams come true.

    Like fuck, it’s not hard.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    It is irresponsible, and arguably downright evil to uncritically regurgitate what the dictator says in your headlines, The Dependent. Fuck you, you’re part of the problem.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Most of the Independent is owned by Evgeny Lebedev and by Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel. To the extent that it has an editorial point of view at all, it aims not to offend oligarchs and Saudi royals.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m calling it now. Trump can’t seem to get people mad enough to violently resist him, so some MAGA zealots will take some pot shots at guardsman in a false flag operation so hat Trump can invoke the Insurrection Act and become dictator for life.

    Edit: Wait…

    The deployments will take place across the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, per Fox.

    I confess that I assumed these deployments would be to blue states to create strife. These are pretty much all red states. Is he just trying to find all those violent undocumented immigrants he thinks are in the country?

    • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      Red states, but they are going to be showing up in the blue cities in those states

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Its a power consolidation move.

      One - as other commenter said he’ll go after blue havens in the red states

      Two - it normalizes troops in the street for “his people” leading to greater complacency.

      Three: when the red states don’t balk at the deployments, he can use that as ammo when he sends them to a blue state and they resist.

    • dogerwaul@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      24 hours ago

      they’ll start with red states and go after blue counties/cities within them. the conservatives will be fed propaganda about how the liberals are protecting criminals in their own state and blah blah, this will further entrench MAGA and conservatives in general, and resistance will be used to justify spreading the deployment to more states, namely blue ones.

    • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I assume it’s because he’ll receive the least resistance, or even affirmative assistance, there. Once that’s been normalized he’ll move to do it in blue States and point to his “successes” so far to sell it.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      They will hunt immigrants in red states. If blue states start protesting they will be deployed there to fight it. Once it’s normalized they will be deployed anywhere it benefits the government.

    • Pavidus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Here’s my understanding, though I could have missed something while trying to navigate the law. In order for Trump to be able to pull this with the national guard, he needs the consent and authorization of the Governor. He would never get this from blue states, so I imagine the goal is to have red states hand him free power, then target the blue areas within that state. Once we’ve normalized it a bit, it’s easier to force it on the remaining states.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, it’s tough to navigate if, like me, you’re not a lawyer. I’ve been doing a bit of reading on this today and I don’t think he’ll need the governor’s permission. If he can cause enough chaos and violence to justify invoking the insurrection act. That act says, in part:

        §333. Interference with State and Federal law

        The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

        (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

        (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

        This is really terrifying. First, because the law does not clearly define what conditions must exist for the law to be invokes. “Insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” - Could this be more vague? And second because of the phrase, “or by any other means.” He can use literally any other means he chooses. Remember when he told the proud boys to stand back and stand by? Well by invoking this act he could directly arm them and order them to go into a state or city to quell whatever he has decided is an insurrection.

        And if your wondering whether or not he would invoke this act? Remember that back in January of this year he issued an Executive Order that included this tidbit.

        Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807. [Emphasis mine]

        So he’s already tried to find an excuse to invoke it. Now he’s trying to manufacture an excuse.

        • Pavidus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yep, you’ve landed right where I did by trying to learn the legal loopholes. We’re in for a wild ride no matter what.

  • Bonus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    This is purely for show. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. His bullshit is unscaleable.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No shit…

      IT IS 90 per state… what the fuck will it do.

      There are 30,000 police officers in Illinois and about 2500 Police Departments in Texas…

      • Bonus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The Trump administration reportedly plans to mobilize up to 1,700 National Guard troops across 19 states

        You’re right. I deleted a comment I wrote earlier because I thought I read that wrong but yep, that is across states, not per states. Yeah, the numbers are just half-ass bullshit. Ineffective by design. It’s how he approached building the wall. What they did was a con job, poorly implemented, failing by definition, the work of charlatans.

      • Bonus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        The cost of things. He will bankrupt his own craven ambitions, just like everything else he ever touches. There are already issues along these lines such as he’s spreading National Guard budgets thin, etc. He just doesn’t have the resources he thinks he has. There isn’t a bottomless fund. He overplays his hand on this in every venture.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          We just gave ICE a hundred billion dollars. I don’t think funding is going to be a problem

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Where are the trump/Epstein documents and why aren’t journalists asking him about these every single day?

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      In DC? That is where the most crime is. 1700 people with oaths sworn to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic should start in the White House, then move onto The House of Representatives and then the Senate and Supreme Court.

      Edit. Once that is done, then you can sweep the red states.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Workin the mean streets of Salt Lake City, De Moines, Boise, and Cheyenne

      They might even need to bring a water gun